Writer: John Lerwill
Date:Wednesday April 8 2009
There was a time - long ago it seems now - when two sides, trusty and true, were put out to battle (as it were) to determine which side was the better. The skill of the joust was as important as the result. Sometimes, two or three 'jousts' had to be played in the same number of days, in the days of old. Once, two 'jousts' were played on the same day.
Sometimes, a side that had a lost a player or two (through injury) still won. There is a marvellous account of how the black knight (Frank Barson) once played like 4 men to fill the gaps left by THREE of his side that had been injured and had to leave the field.
Then they said that the injuries at the big occasions were getting too numerous, and it was unfair that a side should have to play through perhaps three-quarters of the match with the handicap of less than the full number.
The age of the substitute was born.
Of course, the manager with the nous and the win-at-al-costs mentality encouraged a player to feign injury so that the substitute could come on. And then the number of substitutes started increasing. And then they started bringing substitutes on with 3 or 2 or 1 or 0 minutes to go ... just to slow things down.
It's a sham. Yes, and when they bring on a skilled 17/18-year-old (coming on 27) with just a few minutes to go, of course the daisy-fresh young man is likely to turn a match that was just before going against his team. The guile-less opposing manager also has a 17/18-year-old that might just have similarly achieved a score, but he opts for safety-first. Yes, that man - it could be said - was at fault for not being as brave as his opponent.
But, perhaps there is an alternative to this last-10-minutes lunacy. Perhaps we can go back to a more level playing field.
A return, please, to the fight to the end. Okay, not perhaps as it used to be, but instead in not allowing a substitute on in (say) the last 15 minutes of a match, unless there is a case of serious injury.
In such a case, if the red knights had been behind and still won in the last 15 minutes (+), we would probably have said that the best team had won. Wouldn't we?
Date:Wednesday April 8 2009
Sinclair, Demba Ba & Others (Thursday January 29 2015)
An Interview With Carles Gil (Thursday January 29 2015)
Tom Fox Has Wrong Narrative, Here Is The Right One (Wednesday January 28 2015)
Steer Won't Get Yeovil Loan Extension? (Wednesday January 28 2015)
Weimann Wants Wembley (Wednesday January 28 2015)
Leicester FA Cup Tie Chosen For TV (Wednesday January 28 2015)
Vital Villa Player Of The Month For January (Wednesday January 28 2015)
Vital Villa Man Of The Match v Bournemouth FA Cup (Wednesday January 28 2015)
Fans Have A False Narrative - Lambert STAYING (Wednesday January 28 2015)
Aston Villa Is A 'Classic Car` Football Club (Wednesday January 28 2015)
|3.||Pride of Lions||686|
|Leicester City||1||-||0||Aston Villa|
|Aston Villa||0||-||0||Crystal Palace|
|Aston Villa||1||-||1||Man Utd|
|13. Crystal Palace||22||5||8||9||-8||23|
|15. Aston Villa||22||5||7||10||-14||22|
|18. Hull City||22||4||7||11||-10||19|
|Swansea City Agree Fee For Southampton's Cork
» Swansea : 29/01/2015 20:01:00
|FA Youth Cup - Chelsea 6 Swansea 0
» Chelsea : 29/01/2015 19:10:00
|Allardyce Talks Liverpool (a)
» West Ham : 29/01/2015 18:53:00
|Mutch Departs For Palace
» Q.P.R. : 29/01/2015 18:46:00
» Newcastle : 29/01/2015 17:41:00