Writer: J P Fear
Date:Saturday May 17 2008
John Doe from Vital Liverpool posted the following in our Vital Villa article comments on the recent row between Martin O'Neill and Liverpool boss Tom Jones, sorry Rafa Benitez.
This is from the blog of Tony Barrett, the journalist who first broke the news about Liverpool's bid for Barry in the Liverpool Echo.
Sorry Martin - but you've got it wrong!
MARTIN O'Neill's anger about Liverpool's offer for Gareth Barry seems to be centred on the fact that news of the bid appeared in the ECHO within hours of it being faxed to Villa Park rather than on the offer itself. The Villa boss has convinced himself that the story was leaked to the ECHO by someone at Liverpool Football Club.
But like Sorry Martin - but you've got it wrong!
MARTIN O'Neill's anger about Liverpool's offer for Gareth Barry seems to be centred on the fact that news of the bid appeared in the ECHO within hours of it being faxed to Villa Park rather than on the offer itself.
The Villa boss has convinced himself that the story was leaked to the ECHO by someone at Liverpool Football Club.
But like the Alonso conspiracy theorists, O'Neill hasn't called this one right. Journalists never reveal their sources but it would be remiss to allow the current misapprehension to go unchecked.
No-one at Liverpool leaked news of the bid for Barry. Simple as that.'
Tony Barrett's blog can be found at: Click Here
Now I'm not trying to stoke any fires - and no doubt some readers won't actually look at what is being said before blasting the 'evil' opposition club. But frankly I found the whole row bizarre. Liverpool bid for a player. We rejected it. And........... ? There valuation was seemingly pathetic, so? At the end of the day, they mess about like that, they then don't stand a chance of getting the player, but again, so? Why the war of words in the press? Was it not unseemly? It was certainly unprofessional and did neither club any favours at all did it?
I'm afraid if we are going to get some players in this summer, we are going to have to bid. Now that might upset some clubs that we want their players and yes, we might even go in with a lower than we expect to pay bid in the first instance. So? Should we expect a tirade from that players club?
Lets hope this sort of row doesn't have to become a regular occurance, the only winners are the press and of course our sites as it gets everyone angry and talking!
Date:Saturday May 17 2008
Delph Must Be Kept - Poll Results (Thursday October 2 2014)
Football vs Golf (Wednesday October 1 2014)
The Villa Times - 30/09/2014 (Tuesday September 30 2014)
Which Villan Would You Most Like To Keep? (Monday September 29 2014)
U21s - Villa 3-0 Bolton (Monday September 29 2014)
Benteke Steps Up His Fitness (Monday September 29 2014)
The Vital Villa Fantasy League Table (Monday September 29 2014)
Lambert Content Following Chelsea Loss (Sunday September 28 2014)
Stats: Chelsea v Aston Villa (Saturday September 27 2014)
Vital Villa Match Day - Villa Away To Chelsea (Saturday September 27 2014)
|1.||Pride of Lions||49|
|Aston Villa||2||-||1||Hull City|
|3. Man City||6||3||2||1||5||11|
|6. Aston Villa||6||3||1||2||-3||10|
|7. Man Utd||6||2||2||2||2||8|
|9. Crystal Palace||6||2||2||2||0||8|
|Moses wins QPR man of the match poll
» Stoke : 02/10/2014 17:27:00
|Ref Watch: Swarbrick to referee Sunderland v Stoke
» Stoke : 02/10/2014 17:18:00
|McGregor Injury Blow
» Hull City : 02/10/2014 17:17:00
|Neil Swarbrick Back For Stoke Game.
» Sunderland : 02/10/2014 17:05:00
|Williams Will Return, McCarthy Next Out?
» Crystal Palace : 02/10/2014 17:01:00