Vital Football

Latest Aston Villa News

Villa For Sale For Less?

Villa For Sale For Less?

Following the sale of the land, do we now assume that we are being sold for £7million less?

It may be good news that the Serpentine land has been sold, despite the fact it has gone far far cheaper than Doug said it was worth (someone finally convinced him that luxury houses and apartments wouldn't be appropriate for that part of Aston with the M5 running above it?), especially for Doug and the board as it will help ease the shock of the interim report.

But now we have sold part of the land bank that Doug has valued so highly over the years (and credit where credit is due, buying and selling the land at a profit is good business) does that now mean that Villa are no longer being pitched at £64million but that they will be available to potential suitors (if indeed anyone ever comes forward) for £57million?

Or is that not how Dougeconomics work?


Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:J P Fear
Date:Wednesday June 7 2006
Time: 7:53PM

Comments

0
Should do!!!
Villain Of The North
07/06/2006 21:20:00
0
M5? That's some car park! As the M5 is several miles away surely we should have got more than £7m for a piece of land that big?! ;o)
Silver Fox
07/06/2006 21:27:00
0
It's not how any economics works! When the sale price for this land is received it goes into the company and will be used to reduce bank overdraft or buy other assets, maybe even players! So if the sale price for 100% of the shares had built into it that this land was worth £7m, then the sale price, on the face of it, should stay the same.
moonstone
07/06/2006 21:32:00
0
strange the sale valuation is based on an expected valuation of the clubs assets. If the assets about to be sold were valued at 7 million you are right otherwise what you say is pure *********, especially if as it seems the land was valued much higher in the sale brochure.
avfc48
07/06/2006 22:46:00
0
Not sure I agree with your assesment there moonstone, the value of AV Plc includes the land, if that land is sold, it will no longer be part of the assets. Of course the asset will still be there but in terms of cash rather than land, and therefore the value of the company is unchanged. However, if reports are correct, the land was valued as an asset with a higher value than it's sale price, or to put it annother was, with thoughts for pålanning permission and redevelopment, it was overvalued. This sale, if aporved will fix the price of the asset at it's actuall market value, and with this being lower than the estimated value as an asset owned by the company, the overall value of the company will be reduced. It will also realize a fixed asset into it's "liquid" form, or to put it another way, it will be available for investment in whatever way the board sees fit. But I doubt that will be on players, probably on debt reduction unless it's true that we are a debt free club, in which case , who knows? Bodymore Heath perhaps.
Villain Of The North
07/06/2006 22:55:00
0
Just a little footnote. If the board decide to disperse funds by way of dividends, to the shareholders (highly unlikely, but possible) the value of the club for sale in one way decreases, due to the club having fewer assets, but in another way increases as, by the natural law of supply and demand, any company shares on the stock exchange that pay a dividend increase in value as they are more desirable. ;-) So in essence, nobody really knows until it happens.
Villain Of The North
07/06/2006 23:01:00
0
Lads you are looking at this the wrong way, he sold it for 7m so he could give the dreary one some buying power, he heard Damian Duff might leave Russia and as he is going to sell Barry to Spurs wants to show he still has ambition????
irish villa
08/06/2006 08:10:00
0
The crux of the matter is the "potential" value of the land. It was valued at only 100k on the balance sheet, but was clearly worth more than that. The same could be said about Aston Villa plc. If the total share issue was only valued at (for example) 34 million, and Ellis was asking for 64 million, he was asking for that extra 30 million on the basis of the "potential" value of assets which were undervalued on the balance sheet/stock exchange. Now that this land has been sold, it reduces the balance sheet fixed assets by 100k and, subsequently, the potential value should be decreased by 7 million. The big question is what portion of the premium value Doug was placing on the company did this land take up? My best guess is that Doug will claim to be have got a much better deal for the company, that the land was only worth (at a guess) 4 million so the asking price is now 60 million. But, the flip side of it is that the Comers and Villa were said to be 10 million apart in their respective valuations of the club. Maybe they'll compromise on 7 million and bid at 61 million?
GaztonVilla
08/06/2006 08:31:00
0
Personally I don't think that this is good news for the Corner's bid. Remember that property development is their business. Do you honestly beleive that Doug would get a better deal or make better use of the land than a familiy that has made over £1 billion by buying / selling / developing land? Not me!!
Villain Of The North
08/06/2006 09:39:00
0
Still £10m over the market cap, u got to be mad to buy it for that price. Hardly a lucrative club at the moment are we!
leelindsay
08/06/2006 10:48:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Best of Vital Network

Recent Aston Villa Articles

Follow Live On Twitter - Blackburn v Aston Villa

Aston Villa go to Ewood Park as the visitors to Blackburn today, this will be a 3pm kick-off.

Something For The Weekend (573)

I just love it when a much-scorned player answers his critics, especially when that critic is myself.

Bruce Confirms Four Summer Targets Max

Manager Steve Bruce has confirmed that this summer he will be after four 'players of real quality' as we look for a real promotion challenge in 2017/18.

Kodjia's A Welcome Return For Bruce

Manager Steve Bruce has been waxing lyrical about striker Jonathan Kodjia once again.

Archived Vital Villa Articles

Vital Villa articles from

Site Journalists

J P Fear
Editor email
Profile
Mike Field
Editor email
Profile
Steve Wade
no email
Profile
Villa_Grizzly
no email
Profile
Turkish Penguin
no email
Profile
Glensider
no email
Profile
Chris Heath
no email
Profile
M Calucar
no email
Profile
JuanPablo Angel
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Aston Villa v Blackburn (away) will:
Suggested By: Mystic Mug
Win38%
Lose33%
Draw29%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
P Brighton 44 28 8 8 92 35
P Newcastle 45 28 7 10 91 42
3 Huddersfield 44 25 6 13 81 3
4 Reading 44 24 7 13 79 1
5 Sheff Wed 44 23 9 12 78 15
6 Fulham 44 21 13 10 76 27
7 Leeds Utd 44 22 7 15 73 14
8 Norwich 44 19 9 16 66 12
9 Brentford 44 18 9 17 63 12
10 Derby County 44 17 12 15 63 2
11 Preston 44 16 13 15 61 2
12 Aston Villa 44 16 13 15 61 0
13 Cardiff 45 16 11 18 59 -4
14 Barnsley 44 15 12 17 57 0
15 Wolves 44 15 10 19 55 -3
16 Ipswich 44 13 16 15 55 -6
17 Bristol City 44 14 9 21 51 -6
18 Burton 44 13 12 19 51 -12
19 Q.P.R. 44 14 8 22 50 -12
20 Forest 44 13 9 22 48 -11
21 Birmingham 44 11 14 19 47 -22
22 Blackburn 44 10 15 19 45 -15
23 Wigan 44 10 11 23 41 -16
R Rotherham 44 5 6 33 21 -58
The Vital Football Members League
Latest F1 News
2017 Russia GP - FP2
Latest Vital Boxing News
Politics Will Prevent a Unified Division
Vital Football Comment

Recent Aston Villa Results (view all)

Aston Villa Fixtures (view all)

Apr 29 2017 3:00PM : Blackburn Rovers (a)
Sky Bet Championship
May 7 2017 12:00PM : Brighton & Hove Albion (H)
Sky Bet Championship

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.JuanPabloAngel386
2.Pride of Lions361
3.The Fear290
4.sirdennis283
5.Silhillvilla212
6.HeathfieldRoad1874184
7.Melon Donkey176
8.kefkat164
9.Sasquatch147
10.BBJ115
Write for Vital Football