UK time is: 01:44:14
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Villa Asset Sold Off

Can someone explain to me the difference between a new board coming in and selling the land Aston Villa own and our current board doing it?

Why would the one set be seen as 'asset strippers' but the present incumbents aren't?

Still very good news, especially for Doug and his merry men who have made yet another balls up in running this PLC

Anyway, Villa have made the following announcement:

The Board of Aston Villa Plc ('Aston Villa' or the 'Company') has today conditionally agreed to dispose of an area of non-core land and property (the 'Serpentine Property'), for a gross consideration of 7.31 million in cash to Birmingham Community Sports Limited (the 'Disposal').
The Serpentine Property comprises land and buildings lying between Serpentine Road to the north and Aston Hall Road to the south in Aston, Birmingham. The use of the property by the Company is limited to match day car parking adjacent to Aston Villa Football Club.

In the year ended 31 May 2005, the Serpentine Property generated income before tax of 27,684. The cost of the assets of the Serpentine Property as at 30 November 2005 amounted to approximately 0.1 million.

The net book value of the Serpentine Property at 30 November 2005 amounted to approximately 0.1 million. The net proceeds from the Disposal will allow the Company to reduce debt within the group and will also be used for general corporate purposes.

As a result of a preliminary approach made to Aston Villa on 19 September 2005 (subsequently confirmed as being made by Aston Villa Investments Limited ('AVIL')) which might or might not lead to an offer for the Company, Aston Villa was placed into an offer period under the Takeover Code (the 'Code'). Following the original approach from AVIL, discussions have also been held with a number of other interested parties. These discussions are on-going and the Board will provide you with further information as and when there is a material change to their status.

In such circumstances, Rule 21.1 of the Code restricts Aston Villa from entering into arrangements other than in the ordinary course of business without shareholder approval.

Shareholder approval for the Disposal will therefore be sought at an Extraordinary General Meeting ('EGM') to be held on 10 July 2006. The notice convening the EGM, along with further details on the Disposal, will be set out in a circular to be sent to shareholders shortly.

The EGM will be held solely to vote upon a resolution to approve the Disposal. No other matter will be considered. The Disposal will be approved if a simple majority of the shares voted in person at the EGM, or by proxy, are voted in favour of it.

The sale and purchase agreement in relation to the Disposal (the 'Disposal Agreement') provides for shareholder approval to be obtained on or before 31 July 2006. In the event that shareholder approval is not so obtained, the Disposal Agreement may be terminated by Birmingham Community Sports Limited or the Company.

In the event that shareholder approval is so obtained, the Disposal Agreement becomes unconditional.

On satisfaction of the condition precedent, the Disposal Agreement provides for completion of the Disposal of the Serpentine Property on or before 7 December 2006. On completion, the sale consideration will be payable.

In order to give greater certainty that the Disposal will complete, the Company has obtained irrevocable undertakings from the Directors of Aston Villa to vote in favour of the resolution proposed at the EGM to approve the Disposal (the 'Resolution'), in respect of 3,946,914 shares in aggregate, representing approximately 34.47 per cent. of the existing issued share capital of Aston Villa. In the event, that the Board is notified by a third party of an intention to make an offer for the share capital of the Company prior to approval of this Disposal at the EGM on 10 July 2006, these irrevocable undertakings will lapse.

The Board considers the Disposal to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!


Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: J P Fear Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday June 7 2006

Time: 7:10PM

Your Comments

Good news then I take it? 7million for DOL's transfer kitty maybe?
deanovilla
Yes, and Doug can ask 7m less for the sale of the club?
The Fear
Down the back of the sofa mate, or is it, could it be, surely not PAY OFF TIME!!!!
fatloser
Bring in Milner and get rid of D'OL
groseyboy
is there any aston villa fans out there who actually wants DOL in charge lol?
green giant 12
The money will disapear into corporate accounts and reduce the annual loss. In playing terms, we will not notice a single thing!!! However, as pointed out, the asking price for the club should come down and with that, increase chances of a sale so, yep, good news.
Villain Of The North
Have to agree with Villain Of The North. I will be amazed if any of this money finds its way towards team strengthening. It is though good news, months way overdue, but good news all the same, if only because it surely reduces the asking price for the sale of the club. Wonder what finally convinced the old boy that his valuation and the actual open market price, were poles apart. Stubborn old fool.
glensider
The good news from this is that, like Villain of the North said, this money will be used to reduce the severity of the losses which are bound to be announced soon. No player will NEED to be sold to soften the blow, so unless Gareth Barry or Steven Davis wants to leave, Villa don't NEED to sell him.
GaztonVilla
7m to buy more wasters
leelindsay
Madness! Villa look like they are in free fall. All of my Villa mates are pulling their hair out at the moment.
BigYid
Whatever the money is used for, it can't be madness. Which ever way you look at it, the land was sold (if the sale is approved) at a profit amnd it was not making any money. in financial terms an aasset can only be described as such if it is making money, if not it is a liability. in selling the land it changes from liability to asset. I just wory what signal this sends to prospective investors but for immediate future it can only be good.
Villain Of The North
Don't understand all this nonsense to be honest, it seems that there is very rarely an occasion with villa where the shareholders and the supporters can be happy at the same time.
andrew144
All recent and current actions at Villa are those you expect to see in failing business. Under investment in the core product, diminishing quality of that product, declining customer base, departure of key staff (the under performers stick around unfortunately) and panic selling of assets to support deteriorating financial performance. All of which leads to a self feeding cycle of decline, only halted when a new and dynamic management team gets installed and reverses the cycle.
Stevew
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Articles

Vlaar - We Still Need A Win (Saturday April 19 2014)

Lambert Hails Huge Southampton Point (Saturday April 19 2014)

U21 Manchester City Clash Set (Saturday April 19 2014)

Stats: Aston Villa v Southampton (Saturday April 19 2014)

Something For The Weekend (459) (Friday April 18 2014)

Deeney In, Helenius Out? (Thursday April 17 2014)

Lambert Upbeat Ahead Of Saints Clash (Thursday April 17 2014)

Archived Articles

List All Vital Villa Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Pride of Lions 913
2. The Fear 787
3. ClivetheVillan 328
4. Barney2004 250
5. Villan57 230
6. Villan Of The North 207
7. BlackCountry Villa 195
8. tarzan 194
9. sirdennis 192
10. Sussex Villan 186

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
12. West Ham 35 10 7 18 -10 37
13. Swansea 35 9 9 17 -4 36
14. Hull City 33 10 6 17 -6 36
15. Aston Villa 34 9 8 17 -14 35
16. WBA 33 6 15 12 -11 33
17. Norwich 34 8 8 18 -27 32
18. Cardiff 35 7 9 19 -34 30

Breaking League News

Monk's Reaction After Vital Newcastle Win
Swansea : 19/04/2014 22:00:00
Pardew: We Should Have Won Against Swansea
Swansea : 19/04/2014 21:56:00
Mel - A Good Week Of Training
WBA : 19/04/2014 21:24:00
Finishing Annoys Pochettino
Southampton : 19/04/2014 21:05:00
Duo In PFA Nominations
Southampton : 19/04/2014 20:53:00
Pulis - We Don't Get The Credit We Deserve
Crystal Palace : 19/04/2014 20:34:00
Ole - Soft Penalty Galvanised Us
Cardiff : 19/04/2014 20:12:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Southampton MotM
Suggested By:  MF
Guzan 10%
Bacuna 2%
Bertrand 2%
Westwood 7%
Vlaar 7%
Baker 0%
El Ahmadi 2%
Delph 2%
Agbonlahor 0%
Albrighton 68%
Weimann 0%
Sub - Holt 0%
Sub - Robinson 0%