UK time is: 09:17:21
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Were Villa Wrong To Sell Crouch?

With ex Aston Villa striker Peter Crouch scoring a hattrick for England on Saturday, as well as missing a penalty:

Crouch Apologises for penalty: Click Here

and the fact that even the pundits seem split on the player:

Opinions split on Crouch: Click Here

I thought I'd run a poll asking if Villa were right to sell Peter Crouch to Southampton -especially when you bear in mind they later sold him on to Liverpool at a 5million profit and he now plays regularly for England!

Now obviously I'm an expert and could see the potential. WHAT? Oh ok, I didn't think he would ever make the grade but was amazed when we sold him for such a small amount of money, especially when we are always being told how small the squad is by the manager.

So, Peter Crouch, what do you think?

The options are 'he should have been kept and I said so'. 'In hindsight he should have been kept'. 'PC is an average striker'. 'Is a great striker'. 'Villa were right to sell him'. '2m? What were you thinking DOL?'

One thing you could always guarantee is he would give 100% and he did always try. My vote goes for the in hindsight option, although I'm still not convinced he is a world class striker, so it either shows the lack of depth for England or he'll be a gem this world cup and convince me totally. The latter would be very nice thank you!

Certainly seems that Graham Taylor is having the last laugh after the criticism he got for signing Crouch from Portsmouth.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!


Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: J P Fear Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday June 5 2006

Time: 9:00AM

Your Comments

Crouch wouldn't be in the England squad if he had stayed at Villa. Sven is unsure where Birmingham is, ask Gareth Barry.
still skeggy
Hindsight is a great thing for producing experts, but yes, in hindsight he should have been kept. Then again there is always the question of would he have been as successful here as he was at Southampton? I firmly believe that playing for a big club like ours was a huge weight on a player so young. Moving to Southampton took a huge weight off his shoulders and allowed him to reproduce his form from his Portsmouth days. The way he handled the move to Liverpool is a credit to him, and also to Rafa Benitez.
GaztonVilla
It seemed fairly obvious to me that he had huge potential in his short stay. I was outraged when he was sold at a big loss, and have had zero faith in O'Leary's transfer dealings since. He wasted a fortune at Leeds and has wasted a small fortune at Villa Park.
wittonlanehillvet
It was the loss we sold him at that was difficult to take, I'd never imagined he would become an England striker though. Disagree about the weight on his shoulders Gazton, when he came back with Southampton he was warming up near where I sit, he came over to get his ball back and was asked if he was missing it at Villa. He said he was and asked if he could sit on our bench for the game! Given a run who knows what he might have been able to do? I was never very sure but you could guarantee he would always get involved and give 100%. To sell him for 2m AND NO SELL ON CLAUSE so we got nothing when he went to Liverpool, was just reckless by the board.
The Fear
Mind you, crouch does look at much better player when he's got a good strike partner. At southampton he had phillips and for England he's got Owen. Maybe if Villa had bought Phillips sooner things might've been so different.....
andrew144
With Englands present midfield any striker would look good
alphieblues
villa were right to sell crouch he wasent that good back then, u couldnt wait around for him to come good, its just one of those things
green giant 12
The Fear has it right again! Not have included a sell on clause in the deal for Crouch is typical of the lack of vision from our beloved chairman. The same applies to the Milner deal, where a fee should have been agreed for Villa to have the option to sign him at the end of the loan deal. Maybe we'll regret not including a sell on clause in the Vassell deal too?
DougInABox
Very good point alphieblues, and on the flipside, the way our midfield was set up last season, we'd make any striker look bad. :(
The Fear
At the time I thought that getting 2m for him was an outstanding piece of business from our point of view. Even in his early days at Southampton he wasnt pulling up any trees, and certainly wasnt looked upon as a first choice striker at St. Mary's. I suspect that his real level lays somewhere between the guy who left Villa Park with his tail between his legs, and his current standing as flavour of the month. All credit to him though. He's proved a lot of people wrong.
glensider
I think Peter Crouch is well overated but, only time will tell. If he has a good world cup and proves me wrong then I will eat my words..Although I definitely don't think he's worth his 7m price tag.
scottm_1989
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Aston Villa Articles

Bent No Longer For Sale? (Saturday August 30 2014)

Latest SCG Questions Published (Saturday August 30 2014)

Senderos - Build On The Clean Sheets (Saturday August 30 2014)

Something For The Weekend (464) (Friday August 29 2014)

The Villa Times - 29/08/2014 (Friday August 29 2014)

A CLEVERLEY Biased Article (Friday August 29 2014)

A Cleverley Offer From Lambert? (Thursday August 28 2014)

Archived Aston Villa Articles

List All Vital Villa Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. The Fear 1099
2. Pride of Lions 780
3. ClivetheVillan 569
4. Villan Of The North 352
5. kefkat 305
6. mike_field 301
7. sirdennis 277
8. Barney2004 268
9. gator 259
10. Juan Mourep 253

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Aston Villa 0 - 0 Newcastle
Stoke 0 - 1 Aston Villa

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
5. Arsenal 2 1 1 0 1 4
6. Southampton 3 1 1 1 1 4
7. Hull City 2 1 1 0 1 4
8. Aston Villa 2 1 1 0 1 4
9. Stoke 3 1 1 1 0 4
10. West Ham 3 1 0 2 -1 3
11. Liverpool 2 1 0 1 -1 3

Breaking League News

Slip or Not, There Was Only Going To Be 1 Winner
Swansea : 30/08/2014 22:16:00
Simpson Seals Leicester Switch
Q.P.R. : 30/08/2014 22:07:00
Austin Off The Mark
Q.P.R. : 30/08/2014 21:48:00
NUFC v Crystal Palace Match Analysis
Newcastle : 30/08/2014 21:21:00
Martinez Disappointed With Defending
Everton : 30/08/2014 21:16:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Villa v Hull will:
Suggested By:  Mystic Mug
Win 52%
Lose 25%
Draw 23%