UK time is: 19:59:48
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Who Makes The Footballing Decisions?

So, the board and especially Doug Ellis have decided to back David O'Leary and give him the chance to prove that last seasons 'disastrous' 16th place was a 'one off'.

Ok, most don't agree with the decision but in some ways it might be fair to give him the chance to correct his mistakes, I'd say he will have to start the season very well (as opposed to last years worst start in 35 years) or the fans and the board will be straight on his back.

What concerns me now is who will make the footballing decisions?

David O'Leary has hinted that he would like to buy midfielder Eirik Bakke and the fact that Leeds United failed to gain promotion to the Premiership after they lost 3-0 to Watford in the play offs on Sunday would suggest he may be available.

BUT when Doug was asked about the player he told the Sunday Mercury:

'He can't even get into the Leeds side on a regular basis - that's my answer to that.'

Now don't get me wrong, I actually agree and think that Bakke is injured far too often. When he did get some fitness he looked useful for Villa but it would be far too big a risk.

However, who makes the footballing decisions? IF you don't trust your manager and his selections, then why keep him at the football club? The only person choosing players - after being given a budget - should be the manager.

If not, I'd call on Doug Ellis to do what he has always wanted to do and become our manager. Why not, he does everything else (albeit badly)?




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!


Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: J P Fear Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday May 22 2006

Time: 2:29PM

Your Comments

rather have berson than bakke.its the first decent thing deadlys said.
JASON
rather have berson than bakke.its the first decent thing deadlys said.
JASON
But the point is Jason, that the manager is meant to manage the team. It isn't about who WE think should be bought, sold, played or benched. It is down to the manager. IF he isn't backed, he has to be sacked as far as I'm concerned.
The Fear
But the point is Jason, that the manager is meant to manage the team. It isn't about who WE think should be bought, sold, played or benched. It is down to the manager. IF he isn't backed, he has to be sacked as far as I'm concerned.
The Fear
Any manager worth his salt would not put up with this type of interferance, especially when it is done in public. Tends to add credance to the view that DOL is only still with us because we cant afford to get rid of him. If he realises that this is the case, does that mean that, for all his pontificating in the press, he is just "going through the motions" this season?
Bubbadog
Any manager worth his salt would not put up with this type of interferance, especially when it is done in public. Tends to add credance to the view that DOL is only still with us because we cant afford to get rid of him. If he realises that this is the case, does that mean that, for all his pontificating in the press, he is just "going through the motions" this season?
Bubbadog
I cant imagine for one minute DOL allowing himself to be dictated to by Ellis, when it comes to the buying and selling of players. Things could get very interesting as the summer progresses. Despite the vote of confidence by the board for DOL, I dont think that all is as it should be. We shall see.
glensider
I cant imagine for one minute DOL allowing himself to be dictated to by Ellis, when it comes to the buying and selling of players. Things could get very interesting as the summer progresses. Despite the vote of confidence by the board for DOL, I dont think that all is as it should be. We shall see.
glensider
He shouldnt be getting in the way of transfers, your right, but on this occasion lets hope he has. Signing Bakke would be a mistake.
Aronno7
He shouldnt be getting in the way of transfers, your right, but on this occasion lets hope he has. Signing Bakke would be a mistake.
Aronno7
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Aston Villa Articles

Delph Out Until The New Year (Saturday October 25 2014)

Lambert Looking For QPR Response (Friday October 24 2014)

QPR Injury Update (Friday October 24 2014)

The Villa Times - 24/10/2014 (Friday October 24 2014)

Lambert - Time To Change Our Focus (Thursday October 23 2014)

Vlaar Wants A Return To Winning Ways (Thursday October 23 2014)

Drennan Returns - So Time For A Round Up (Wednesday October 22 2014)

Okore Not Ready For Premiership Action (Tuesday October 21 2014)

Archived Aston Villa Articles

List All Vital Villa Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Pride of Lions 744
2. The Fear 708
3. ClivetheVillan 587
4. thefacehead 482
5. HeathfieldRoad1874 240
6. sirdennis 230
7. kefkat 220
8. Villan Of The North 159
9. Clubpaver 143
10. DeanoVilla 142

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
10. Spurs 8 3 2 3 -1 11
11. Stoke 9 3 2 4 -2 11
12. WBA 9 2 4 3 -1 10
13. Aston Villa 8 3 1 4 -8 10
14. Everton 8 2 3 3 0 9
15. Leicester City 8 2 3 3 -2 9
16. Crystal Palace 9 2 3 4 -3 9

Breaking League News

Leicester City : 25/10/2014 19:34:00
Sunderland : 25/10/2014 17:31:00
Crystal Palace : 25/10/2014 17:06:00
WBA : 25/10/2014 17:01:00
Southampton : 25/10/2014 16:55:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Villa v QPR (away) will:
Suggested By:  Mystic Mug
Win - whoop! 39%
Lose - we go again! 43%
Draw - meh! 18%