Vital Football

Latest Aston Villa News

Would The Fergie Approach Work?

Would The Fergie Approach Work?

Its well documented that Sir Alex was apparently 1 game away from the sack back in 1990 when Mark Robins stooped to score a header against Forest in the 3rd round of the FA Cup, the rest as they say is history.

It had me thinking though as to whether getting rid of David O'Leary would be the best option for us or whether you stick with it and see where it takes you. After all we have had a habit of getting rid of managers for far too long now and it has rarely paid off in my opinion.

One of our longest serving managers that I can recall was Ron Saunders and he went on to win the league in the end as well as lifting the League Cup on two occasions and producing a team that went onto win the European Cup.

Now I'm not saying that DOL will necessarily take us to these heights but is it not worth while sitting back and letting DOL see out his contract taking him to 5 years at the helm to see if he actually gets us somewhere in the end?

Yes I know that the majority of the time the football has been poor, individual mistakes have been at a premium and the home form for the last 2 years has been nothing short of abysmal but as I say we have chopped and changed managers enough over the years to know that it isn't always the answer.

I'm up for giving him one more season to put things right and if nothing improves by this time next year then its bye bye.

People have argued that he has had money to spend and therefore should have improved us beyond doubt by know but I have another slant on it that may just prove that he hasn't exactly had the rub of the green when during his time at Villa Park.

Firstly he inherited a team who had just finished 16th in the Premiership winning one game away all season and only surviving due to their home form. The football was awful, the players average and the dressing room apparently split into several camps.

To sort this lot out the board give him 4m quid to spend. He tries to get Robinson, Phillips and Emerton but the board only allow us to get McCann and Sorenson from the worst team ever to appear in the Premiership(until this season that is).

After a slow start the football improves, everybody is happy and we go on to play some of the best football seen at Villa Park since the Big Ron days. The crowds are back and the place is buzzing with us missing out on Europe due to goal difference.

What do the board do? Back him - not a chance - £4m again allowing him to bring in Laursen from AC Milan and Berson together with 2 loan players. We recoup money by selling Crouch which everyone applauded at the time.

Injuries hit us right from the start of the season and results are naturally effected along the way. More and more kids are thrown in to try and steady the ship and in fairness Europe was still a possibility right up until the Spurs game was a bridge to far.

The January of that season the board showed their true colours again by failing to land long time target James Beattie leaving us with DJ-DJ to contend with because another defensive midfielder is just what we needed!

This summer a major overhaul of players was needed due to the small numbers. In order to improve both numbers and quality in my opinion 25m was needed but only £10m was spent on bringing in 8 players after recouping further money from the sale of Nobby and Vassell.

£10m on 8 players suggests that the quality of such players was going to be average at best and sure enough that has been reflected in the level of performance we have got out of these players coupled with the average players we already had on board. Injuries haven't helped again with everyone of the new signings having had a spell on the sidelines keeping them out of action for lengthy spells. Even more kids have been thrown in to help us out with 5 of the 11 against Everton being under 21 last week - is it fair to expect them to perform in the premiership at a high standard and get results - I don't think so.

All of this surely needs to be taken into consideration when you evaluate the managers time at the club. Had he had all his players available for longer and been backed by the board at the right times then I think we would have been in a much better position points wise and we wouldn't be moaning as much as we are now.

Its worth thinking about when calling for his head.

Would anyone else have done any better in such circumstances?

By WH Taylor

Our latest poll backs up this article to ask for a more balanced reflection!


Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:J P Fear
Date:Wednesday March 29 2006
Time: 3:02PM

Comments

0
Certainly a very balanced view. We do get rid of the managers too often, but I'm not sure that DOL is the right manager. I'd rather a new group came in and would stand by their decision. I do think that it might be too late for DOL to turn the fans opinion now though, especially after this season. Surely most Villa fans know we aren't a world beating side, but Doncaster?
The Fear
29/03/2006 15:12:00
0
Certainly a very balanced view. We do get rid of the managers too often, but I'm not sure that DOL is the right manager. I'd rather a new group came in and would stand by their decision. I do think that it might be too late for DOL to turn the fans opinion now though, especially after this season. Surely most Villa fans know we aren't a world beating side, but Doncaster?
The Fear
29/03/2006 15:12:00
0
I'd love to see a 'Villa man' given a good decade in charge. But every day that DOL remains grates me up the wrong way now, so no he shouldnt be given another week, let alone another 7 years!
DeanoVilla
29/03/2006 15:23:00
0
I'd love to see a 'Villa man' given a good decade in charge. But every day that DOL remains grates me up the wrong way now, so no he shouldnt be given another week, let alone another 7 years!
DeanoVilla
29/03/2006 15:23:00
0
What about if he is chosen by the new owners (cough cough) would you be able to tolerate him and see what he can do with some money, or is it too late for you? I'd go back to the year dot and back the new board therefore the manager, although I would prefer martin o'neil!!!!
The Fear
29/03/2006 15:25:00
0
What about if he is chosen by the new owners (cough cough) would you be able to tolerate him and see what he can do with some money, or is it too late for you? I'd go back to the year dot and back the new board therefore the manager, although I would prefer martin o'neil!!!!
The Fear
29/03/2006 15:25:00
0
It is a good article by Mr. Taylor, but it does exclude certain issues: (1) that DOL has spent (I think) £22m net since he came, and I feel that losing Crouch for only £2m was bad business; (2) that Villa's current style of play seems to a suit a Crouch-like player, so why sell him? Enlarging on that, the manner of play is currently boring the socks off everybody, and has been for some time - perhaps 18 months. It's not the quality of play I would expect from a team managed by someone worth £1m p.a. And what about the performances in the cup competitions aginst lower league opposition? And of course there's (3) the PR factor - does it exist? In short, even though the spend in the summer was not greatly remarkable, with the rise of good youngsters through the ranks, I would still have expected Villa to be in the top-half. Nothing else - just top-half.
the_lergy
29/03/2006 16:50:00
0
It is a good article by Mr. Taylor, but it does exclude certain issues: (1) that DOL has spent (I think) £22m net since he came, and I feel that losing Crouch for only £2m was bad business; (2) that Villa's current style of play seems to a suit a Crouch-like player, so why sell him? Enlarging on that, the manner of play is currently boring the socks off everybody, and has been for some time - perhaps 18 months. It's not the quality of play I would expect from a team managed by someone worth £1m p.a. And what about the performances in the cup competitions aginst lower league opposition? And of course there's (3) the PR factor - does it exist? In short, even though the spend in the summer was not greatly remarkable, with the rise of good youngsters through the ranks, I would still have expected Villa to be in the top-half. Nothing else - just top-half.
the_lergy
29/03/2006 16:50:00
0
Totaly agree with "the lergy" but to be honest, yes I would like huge investment but it has been shown time after time that to be a good premiership side does not require this (ok more investment than at Sunderland, I'll agree to that). O'Leary has a team littered with internationals plus junior internationals and former internationals. So called fans contiually question the quality of Villa players due to poor performances but we have all seen them play excelently on occasions, thus they have the potential but lack the development, inspiration and leadership to perform at that high standard on a regular basis, these elements should come from the management team. O'Leary has shown that he can buy success but with the budget he had at Leads, who couldn't? He has also shown that, regardless of his footballing and coaching abilities (which are in question - he was a great player but José Murinio was not and I think we all agree that he's a far superior manager than O'Leary), he is not a communicator and can be difficult to get along with. If he really does know football and can coach, keep him on as a coach but being manager requires other attributes. I say that we should get a proven manager that is still hungry, perhaps someone from the lower leagues, if his coaching is not up to premiership standars, employ assistants who can do that and help him come up to standard. Being the manager of a football team is about pinking the right players, forming them into a team, being tactically aware and being able to motivate the players, O'Leary has not shown me that he can do any of this. Yes he has to be able to coach too but that is only one part of the job and well coached players, practicing what the manager has instructed, will always perform for a manager in whom they beleive, is tactically aware and can motivate. My personal choice to replace O'Leary, with or without new ownwers, is Tom Nordlie of IK Start in Norway. Just look at Start's recent history to see the miracles he has performed on what is peanuts in the premiership, and in addition they play exciting and attractive football. Of course the argument is that the Norwegian League is not the same standard as the premiership, but I can assure you that at leat the top half of the Norwegian league is as good as (if not better than) the Championship. If you want proof of this you should just look at Rosenborg's record in european competition, they never win anything but they manage to qualify just about every year, and Norwegian teams do not get automatic qualification like clubs from bigger countrys. That's my two-penneth worth anyway!!!!
Villain Of The North
29/03/2006 17:53:00
0
Totaly agree with "the lergy" but to be honest, yes I would like huge investment but it has been shown time after time that to be a good premiership side does not require this (ok more investment than at Sunderland, I'll agree to that). O'Leary has a team littered with internationals plus junior internationals and former internationals. So called fans contiually question the quality of Villa players due to poor performances but we have all seen them play excelently on occasions, thus they have the potential but lack the development, inspiration and leadership to perform at that high standard on a regular basis, these elements should come from the management team. O'Leary has shown that he can buy success but with the budget he had at Leads, who couldn't? He has also shown that, regardless of his footballing and coaching abilities (which are in question - he was a great player but José Murinio was not and I think we all agree that he's a far superior manager than O'Leary), he is not a communicator and can be difficult to get along with. If he really does know football and can coach, keep him on as a coach but being manager requires other attributes. I say that we should get a proven manager that is still hungry, perhaps someone from the lower leagues, if his coaching is not up to premiership standars, employ assistants who can do that and help him come up to standard. Being the manager of a football team is about pinking the right players, forming them into a team, being tactically aware and being able to motivate the players, O'Leary has not shown me that he can do any of this. Yes he has to be able to coach too but that is only one part of the job and well coached players, practicing what the manager has instructed, will always perform for a manager in whom they beleive, is tactically aware and can motivate. My personal choice to replace O'Leary, with or without new ownwers, is Tom Nordlie of IK Start in Norway. Just look at Start's recent history to see the miracles he has performed on what is peanuts in the premiership, and in addition they play exciting and attractive football. Of course the argument is that the Norwegian League is not the same standard as the premiership, but I can assure you that at leat the top half of the Norwegian league is as good as (if not better than) the Championship. If you want proof of this you should just look at Rosenborg's record in european competition, they never win anything but they manage to qualify just about every year, and Norwegian teams do not get automatic qualification like clubs from bigger countrys. That's my two-penneth worth anyway!!!!
Villain Of The North
29/03/2006 17:53:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Aston Villa Articles

Ayew & Amavi To Stay

New owner Dr Tony Xia is getting the hang of that twitter thing and with fresh speculation about the future of Jordan Amavi - Liverpool being linked on Friday - well he's going nowhere.

Morrison's Villa Interest?

Late yesterday evening eagled eyed fans noticed that Ravel Morrison had followed Aston Villa on twitter.

Villa's Youngsters Open With A Win

Aston Villa's Under 21 side kicked off their pre season campaign last night with an emphatic victory over Heather St. Johns.

McCormack Back On Villa's Radar?

Another day another rehash in the media. Despite being strongly linked with Fulham's Ross McCormack all summer, apparently we are now ready to hijack Norwich City's potential...

Archived Vital Villa Articles

Vital Villa articles from

Site Journalists

J P Fear
Editor email
Profile
Mike Field
Editor email
Profile
Steve Wade
no email
Profile
Villa_Grizzly
no email
Profile
Turkish Penguin
no email
Profile
Glensider
no email
Profile
Chris Heath
no email
Profile
M Calucar
no email
Profile
JuanPablo Angel
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Would you keep Scott Sinclair?
Suggested By: JP Fear
Yes, could be an asset61%
No36%
Unsure3%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Barnsley 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Birmingham 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Blackburn 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Bristol City 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Burton 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Cardiff 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Derby County 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Huddersfield 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 Leeds Utd 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 Norwich 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 Forest 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 Preston 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 Q.P.R. 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Reading 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 Rotherham 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 Sheff Wed 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 Wigan 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 Wolves 0 0 0 0 0 0
The Vital Football Members League
Latest F1 News
2016 Hungarian Grand Prix - FP3
Latest Vital Boxing News
Cleverly Gets Braehmer World Title Fight
Vital Football Comment

Recent Aston Villa Results (view all)

Aston Villa Fixtures (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.The Fear444
2.sirdennis172
3.Fulford148
4.kefkat106
5.Silhillvilla95
6.1958Villan87
7.glensider87
8.HeathfieldRoad187484
9.gator77
10.Wurzel76
Write for Vital Football