UK time is: 19:30:18
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

'Unrealistic Fans' Lied To?

RIGHT. Just who is lying to who here? (Or is it to whom?!).

David O'Leary said at the weekend that Gary Cahill wasn't going to be able to make his Premiership bow against Portsmouth because he wasn't 'match fit' despite reports earlier saying he was going to make his debut due to our defensive crisis.

However reports in the Birmingham Mail today say something quite different. In fact it implies that the centre back was given an ultimatum by David O'Leary to sign a new contract or be withdrawn from the squad. Cahill apparently refused to be blackmailed and hence wasn't played.

The quicker the club issue a statement on this matter the better, because IF O'Leary has lied about this, on top of the constant moaning about the board, the players, the fans and everyone else apart from himself, it really is time for him to be run out of Villa Park with his tail between his legs.

According to the report Cahill has 16 months left on his current deal but is looking for improved terms. O'Leary said Cahill was 'not match fit' for the Portsmouth match after a week earlier suggesting he would play.

Over to the club to clear this up.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!


Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: J P Fear Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday March 8 2006

Time: 3:11PM

Your Comments

Surely this is no more than paper talk. DOL wouldn't hold a player to Ransom.
still skeggy
Surely this is no more than paper talk. DOL wouldn't hold a player to Ransom.
still skeggy
He bloody would! DOL OUT!!!!
DeanoVilla
He bloody would! DOL OUT!!!!
DeanoVilla
Let's get this straight from the start. Cahill wasn't match fit. We weren't lied to. We weren't told the whole story, but for keeping an internal contract dispute private, O'Leary should not be criticised. Also, O'Leary had, it seem, two option for the defence on Saturday. 1. Play a recently signed Dutch international defender with vast experience. This player is very short of fitness but has a good defensive brain and plays away from the centre of defence so his shortfall in fitness may not be so apparent. If this lack of fitness is a problem during the game, and things go wrong, the player is old enough and experienced enough to let this one instance not effect him too much. 2. Play a 19 year old defender in his first Premiership game. This player has some experience of first team football with a Championship side, but his single first team appearance for Villa resulted in the team shipping 3 goals in the first half. This player is also very short of match fitness and plays in the centre of defence. Chances are that if this fitness shortage is exposed, it will be done by Lua Lua who is strong and pacey and will run through the centre of defence to cause problems for Villa. Also, given the player's age and lack of experience, it could damage his confidence irrevocably and forever be an albatross around the young man's neck. I know which one I would prefer the manger to have done. Good choice O'Leary. Game won, clean sheet secured.
GaztonVilla
Think we need to wait for the club to clear this one up. If he has lied then ........... ?
The Fear
Let's get this straight from the start. Cahill wasn't match fit. We weren't lied to. We weren't told the whole story, but for keeping an internal contract dispute private, O'Leary should not be criticised. Also, O'Leary had, it seem, two option for the defence on Saturday. 1. Play a recently signed Dutch international defender with vast experience. This player is very short of fitness but has a good defensive brain and plays away from the centre of defence so his shortfall in fitness may not be so apparent. If this lack of fitness is a problem during the game, and things go wrong, the player is old enough and experienced enough to let this one instance not effect him too much. 2. Play a 19 year old defender in his first Premiership game. This player has some experience of first team football with a Championship side, but his single first team appearance for Villa resulted in the team shipping 3 goals in the first half. This player is also very short of match fitness and plays in the centre of defence. Chances are that if this fitness shortage is exposed, it will be done by Lua Lua who is strong and pacey and will run through the centre of defence to cause problems for Villa. Also, given the player's age and lack of experience, it could damage his confidence irrevocably and forever be an albatross around the young man's neck. I know which one I would prefer the manger to have done. Good choice O'Leary. Game won, clean sheet secured.
GaztonVilla
Think we need to wait for the club to clear this one up. If he has lied then ........... ?
The Fear
Lets just wait and see what comes out from the club tomorrow. I'm sure DOL will tell us one thing and then maybe another the day after ;)
Aronno7
Lets just wait and see what comes out from the club tomorrow. I'm sure DOL will tell us one thing and then maybe another the day after ;)
Aronno7
Beyond caring who is doing the lying these days, it is such a regular occurrence. One mightily disillusioned FL
fatloser
Beyond caring who is doing the lying these days, it is such a regular occurrence. One mightily disillusioned FL
fatloser
If its in a newspaper then it must be true?!?!
andrew144
If its in a newspaper then it must be true?!?!
andrew144
Everything that has come out of VP over recent seasons, let alone weeks, has been lies, lies, and more lies. From the boardroom down, through now possibly the manager, we are outright lied to, told mistruths, and completely and utterly deceived. Mind you, lets hold fire on this one until the facts are clarified via an initial statement. Say it aint so Dave, say it aint so.
glensider
Everything that has come out of VP over recent seasons, let alone weeks, has been lies, lies, and more lies. From the boardroom down, through now possibly the manager, we are outright lied to, told mistruths, and completely and utterly deceived. Mind you, lets hold fire on this one until the facts are clarified via an initial statement. Say it aint so Dave, say it aint so.
glensider
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Aston Villa Articles

Former Villa CEO Linked To Forest (Wednesday August 20 2014)

Arsenal Man Linked As Villa's New CEO (Wednesday August 20 2014)

17th Minute Applause For Two Toon Fans (Wednesday August 20 2014)

U21s - Villa 1 1 Stoke (Tuesday August 19 2014)

Ins and Outs Still For Villa? (Tuesday August 19 2014)

Vlaar In BBC Team Of The Week (Tuesday August 19 2014)

The Villa Times - 18/08/2014 (Monday August 18 2014)

A Case For The Attack? (Monday August 18 2014)

Archived Aston Villa Articles

List All Vital Villa Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. The Fear 708
2. Pride of Lions 505
3. ClivetheVillan 421
4. Villan Of The North 289
5. Barney2004 224
6. mike_field 192
7. DeanoVilla 184
8. Juan Mourep 184
9. sirdennis 179
10. kefkat 172

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Stoke 0 - 1 Aston Villa

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
3. Arsenal 1 1 0 0 1 3
4. Liverpool 1 1 0 0 1 3
5. Swansea 1 1 0 0 1 3
6. Aston Villa 1 1 0 0 1 3
7. Hull City 1 1 0 0 1 3
8. Spurs 1 1 0 0 1 3
9. Everton 1 0 1 0 0 1

Breaking League News

What to Do About Nathan Ake?
Chelsea : 20/08/2014 18:06:00
players valuations were met.
Stoke : 20/08/2014 18:00:00
Your Burnley (a) MOTM Was?
Chelsea : 20/08/2014 17:56:00
PSG Set to Force Chelsea`s Hand?
Chelsea : 20/08/2014 17:41:00
Two More Linked to Hammers
West Ham : 20/08/2014 17:22:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Aston Villa v Newcastle (home) will:
Suggested By:  Mystic Mug
Win 50%
Lose 25%
Draw 25%